Print This Post Print This Post

The future of dance philanthropy

One man’s point of view

John Killacky is on a quest for relevance. He fears that many grantmakers will establish new priorities and initiatives regardless of what the field of dance actually needs. He calls for foundations and arts organizations alike to hone their ability to adapt to changing times—emphasizing that being dynamic is as important as building endowment when it comes to long-term success.

These views are put forward in an article in VoiceofDance.com written by Killacky, who is program officer for arts and culture at The San Francisco Foundation.

Four trends of note

Killacky examines current trends transforming how dance is supported, accessed, engaged with, and popularized. Here are the trends, and a sample of his commentary on each:

  • Race and ethnicity: “As our country continues to diversify, fairness and parity issues will demand that foundations consider future grantmaking through a racial equity lens.”
  • Friendraising: “If there is any potential for growth (in arts nonprofit funding), it is in expanding individual donor bases.”
  • Cyberspace: “Dancemakers can learn from media colleagues, making sure choreography is conceived for multiple platforms, the stage behind the fourth wall only being one of them.”
  • Mass appeal: “Ever since the early ‘90s when ‘Got Milk?’ ads appeared, dance wondered how it could similarly capture public imagination. The reality now is that it has.”

In covering these trends, Killacky provides examples of practical responses—ways The San Francisco Foundation, other funders, and nonprofits can move into the future of dance.

The San Francisco Foundation is a participant in Communities Advancing the Arts, a major funding initiative of The James Irvine Foundation.

2 Responses to “The future of dance philanthropy”

  1. As an arts administrator representing a professional choreographer, I am discovering the difference between individual artists versus arts organizations. Dance philanthropy has focused more on the operations of a successful arts organization instead of the production of high-quality art from talented dancemakers in this area. I have addressed this issue many times before on the overly politicized nature of dance in American culture, i.e. how much money (resources) you have and how many people you know.

    The question becomes: is the future of dance philanthropy based only on politics OR supporting, engaging, accessing dance that adds not only artistic, but economic value to the cultural fabric of our nation?

    Jonathon

  2. Thanks for these ideas, John. I think that those considering the points in this post might also be interested in your thoughts on survival strategies for arts organizations, recently posted to:

    http://www.blueavocado.org/content/survival-strategies-arts

    Jason

Leave a Reply

To use reCAPTCHA you must get an API key from http://recaptcha.net/api/getkey